a sense, then, my own religious epistemology could be called postmodern, and the provisional character of systematic consistency accords with the intellectual humility advocated by postmodernism. But radical postmodernists would scorn these sops. They would regard me (perhaps justifiably!) as hopelessly premodern. They reject altogether Western rationality and metaphysics, claiming that there is no objective truth about reality. “The truth,” as John Caputo says, “is that there is no truth.”7 But